News: It's Healthy To Stare At Women's Chests - Watch MoreFunny Videos
I have been leading a healthy lifestyle for nearly 15 years now!
I think that this is fake. It's still funny though.
Showing posts with label fox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fox. Show all posts
Monday, September 19, 2011
Staring at a Woman's Breasts is Good for Your Health
I knew it. I just knew it! Now, science and Fox News back me up. Staring at breasts is GOOD for you.
News: It's Healthy To Stare At Women's Chests - Watch MoreFunny Videos
I have been leading a healthy lifestyle for nearly 15 years now!
I think that this is fake. It's still funny though.
News: It's Healthy To Stare At Women's Chests - Watch MoreFunny Videos
I have been leading a healthy lifestyle for nearly 15 years now!
I think that this is fake. It's still funny though.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Biggest Fox News Error in History!
This is a completely dumb video that has pissed a lot of people off over the years, but it's still funny. Enjoy a video of the biggest Fox News error in history.
Apparently, the kid in the video made this as a project for his class. Well, I guess he did well. Good for him. Or not. Who cares?
Apparently, the kid in the video made this as a project for his class. Well, I guess he did well. Good for him. Or not. Who cares?
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Bill O'Reilly asks a funny question
Bill O'Reilly comes up with a crazy question during this interview from Fox News.
Which child got his testicles crushed? The one who is the anchor on Fox News :)
Which child got his testicles crushed? The one who is the anchor on Fox News :)
Sunday, July 17, 2011
The Lies of Fox News -- Politifact Video
What? Fox news never lies to us. I thought that Fox News and Rupert Murdock loved us?!
So, yeah, for those of you living under a rock for the past 20 years, sometimes Fox news can tend to bend the truth in tiny and almost unrecognizable ways. Or, sometimes they can just blatantly lie. This video outlines the lies of Fox News -- courtesy of Politifact.
So, yeah, for those of you living under a rock for the past 20 years, sometimes Fox news can tend to bend the truth in tiny and almost unrecognizable ways. Or, sometimes they can just blatantly lie. This video outlines the lies of Fox News -- courtesy of Politifact.
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Analysis: President Obama - Bill O'Reilly Interview: Super Bowl Sunday 2010
Here is my analysis of an interested interview between Bill O'Reilly and President Barack Obama from February 2010 during the pregame show for the Superbowl. My comments are below the video.
Overall, I was impressed with the interview. Bill was a bit softer on Obama than he might have otherwise been (especially compared with this interview from 2008) but I thought that he asked just enough tough questions at the first to make the interview interesting. The one question that I wish he would have asked Obama but didn't was about the move by the Obama administration during the first two years of office away from the Bush era policy of challenging dictatorships and promoting democracy around the world. I felt that O'Reilly could have made the point that the U.S. could have been much more active in promoting change in Egypt and other places before 2010 than they ultimately ended up being.
The second part of the interview was refreshingly light. Too often, interviews with the president focus on the difficult political questions faced every day as a part of the job description and on not much else. While I'm not advocating throwing "soft ball" questions to politicians as a matter of course, sometimes it's nice to see the media call back the attack dogs a bit when dealing with these issues. I like that Bill gave Obama a chance to explain how hard the decisions are that he makes on a daily basis. As Obama notes, people have to have a thick skin to survive the election process and become president.
What do you think? Please leave your comments below.
Overall, I was impressed with the interview. Bill was a bit softer on Obama than he might have otherwise been (especially compared with this interview from 2008) but I thought that he asked just enough tough questions at the first to make the interview interesting. The one question that I wish he would have asked Obama but didn't was about the move by the Obama administration during the first two years of office away from the Bush era policy of challenging dictatorships and promoting democracy around the world. I felt that O'Reilly could have made the point that the U.S. could have been much more active in promoting change in Egypt and other places before 2010 than they ultimately ended up being.
The second part of the interview was refreshingly light. Too often, interviews with the president focus on the difficult political questions faced every day as a part of the job description and on not much else. While I'm not advocating throwing "soft ball" questions to politicians as a matter of course, sometimes it's nice to see the media call back the attack dogs a bit when dealing with these issues. I like that Bill gave Obama a chance to explain how hard the decisions are that he makes on a daily basis. As Obama notes, people have to have a thick skin to survive the election process and become president.
What do you think? Please leave your comments below.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Rick Sanchez -- Where Does He Go from Here?
Update: Since I wrote the original article, Rick Sanchez gave an interview to The Daily Beast where he said about his future prospects, "I’m having some very promising conversations with some people in the business to create a platform for me that I could revel in it. I would cherish that. I can’t put a timetable on it because things like this go through the conceptualization stage first before they actually get to fruition, and right now we’re somewhere in between conceptualization and discussions."
What this means to me, reading between the lines, is that Rick probably has no real offers or prospects for any sort of job in the public arena at this stage. However, if he does get another job, I think that it'll be through one of the scenarios I've outlined below.
Rick Sanchez, an award winning reporter for CNN, recently was fired over controversial comments that he made about comedian Jon Stewart and Jews. Does this mean that Rick Sanchez is finished in the media industry, or does he still have a future on television? In this article, I will examine some options that might still be open to Sanchez in the future.
1. Fox News: I view this possibility as kind of a 50/50 toss up whether he gets hired here or not. On the one hand, he already came out and publicly made fun of the left's media darling Jon Stewart, which should give him an angle as an anti-liberal, anti-establishment type. On the other hand, he's Hispanic, which may or may not be a problem on Fox news. Fox already employs Geraldo Rivera as a frequent guest commentator on the Bill O'Reilly show, and this should mean that the Hispanic background of Sanchez wouldn't be a problem. However, Rivera doesn't identify with his Hispanic background as strongly as Sanchez does, and that strong identification with Hispanics might make Sanchez less appealing to conservatives that identify with the anti-immigration movement. Still, out of all the choices available, this move seems the most likely and favorable for Sanchez.
2. Spanish language news channel: This would seem, on the surface, a significant step back for Sanchez. because he would be moving from a national news channel to one with a far smaller audience. However, there is a silver lining to this. The viewership of Spanish language news channels is only going to increase as the Hispanic population of the United States continues to grow. Sanchez could use this growth and his name recognition from CNN to position himself as the preeminent anchor for Spanish language news, a position that might otherwise be open to an anchor like Inez Sainz. Even without the fame of CNN, this position could prove to be far more lucrative and lasting than a position at Fox, especially considering how untapped the Hispanic market still is in the United States. Also, Sanchez would likely enjoy much more freedom of expression on a Hispanic news channel because controversial comments are far less likely to be picked up by the major three English news networks.
3. MSNBC: I see this possibility as somewhat of a very distant third. Sanchez is far enough in the middle that he would, on the surface, make a possible addition to the MSNBC. However, there are two problems here. First, MSNBC is in love with Jon Stewart, and adding anyone as an anchor that had badmouthed him in anyway would likely tick off the stations core viewers. Second, Sanchez is Hispanic and doesn't fit at all into MSNBC's core demographic of yuppies and ultra-liberals. With those two strikes against him, I would be shocked to see him added to MSNBC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
LinkWithin
